We remain fully operational. Our teams are working around the clock to ensure your deliveries continue safely.
قم بتنزيل التطبيق
معلومات عنا
حقوق الطبع والنشر © 2024 Desertcart Holdings Limited
قم بتنزيل التطبيق
Buy anything from 5,000+ international stores. One checkout price. No surprise fees. Join 2M+ shoppers on Desertcart.
Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to KSA.
On Close Reading [Guillory, John, Newstok, Scott] on desertcart.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. On Close Reading Review: A gem of a book - From the classical commentary tradition to the contemporary Common Core, Guillory brings into relief what’s at stake in “close reading” — the most enduring, yet also most contested practice in literary study across the past century. The amount of learning that he consolidates in short space can be staggering; some of his footnotes alone would be fodder for an entire book’s worth of insights by another scholar. As Guillory compellingly argues, close reading entails “showing the work of reading”; it’s an art, a craft, a technique, best learned (like all human practices) through “demonstrative modeling.” Review: Not Close Enough - Guillory does not wear his learning lightly. This article, expanded into a book and padded with an extensive and awkward bibliography, is really a footnote (with its own footnotes) to the professor's Professing Criticism. Guillory continues to make the point that the practice and objects of reading have expanded and shifted drastically. His lasting point is that close reading is a "techne" or method and a rather minimal one at that. This is a truism. Almost all great critics engage in some form of close reading, be they Marxist, feminist, post-structuralist, or Aristotelean. To me, the most conspicuous absence is Samuel Johnson. Johnson's landmark Lives of the Poets is a masterclass of quotation and close reading. Look again at Aristotle's poetics and you will see a lot of pragmatic criticism that anchors itself to quotations. On a side note, his abstruse style is a prime example of how academic writers have abandoned the educated common reader. Guillory is interested in the broader audience of readers, but he certainly doesn't write for them.
| Best Sellers Rank | #603,311 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) #361 in General Books & Reading #746 in Language Arts Teaching Materials #1,715 in Literary Criticism & Theory |
| Customer Reviews | 3.6 3.6 out of 5 stars (9) |
| Dimensions | 5 x 0.36 x 8 inches |
| Edition | First Edition |
| ISBN-10 | 0226837432 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0226837437 |
| Item Weight | 1 pounds |
| Language | English |
| Print length | 144 pages |
| Publication date | January 8, 2025 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
A**E
A gem of a book
From the classical commentary tradition to the contemporary Common Core, Guillory brings into relief what’s at stake in “close reading” — the most enduring, yet also most contested practice in literary study across the past century. The amount of learning that he consolidates in short space can be staggering; some of his footnotes alone would be fodder for an entire book’s worth of insights by another scholar. As Guillory compellingly argues, close reading entails “showing the work of reading”; it’s an art, a craft, a technique, best learned (like all human practices) through “demonstrative modeling.”
M**E
Not Close Enough
Guillory does not wear his learning lightly. This article, expanded into a book and padded with an extensive and awkward bibliography, is really a footnote (with its own footnotes) to the professor's Professing Criticism. Guillory continues to make the point that the practice and objects of reading have expanded and shifted drastically. His lasting point is that close reading is a "techne" or method and a rather minimal one at that. This is a truism. Almost all great critics engage in some form of close reading, be they Marxist, feminist, post-structuralist, or Aristotelean. To me, the most conspicuous absence is Samuel Johnson. Johnson's landmark Lives of the Poets is a masterclass of quotation and close reading. Look again at Aristotle's poetics and you will see a lot of pragmatic criticism that anchors itself to quotations. On a side note, his abstruse style is a prime example of how academic writers have abandoned the educated common reader. Guillory is interested in the broader audience of readers, but he certainly doesn't write for them.
ترست بايلوت
منذ يومين
منذ أسبوعين