The Tempest (Signet Classics)

This Kindle edition of Shakespeare's late (some think final) play, "The Tempest," is in fact two books in one, both illustrated, both from around the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth. The text of the book has no pretensions to be a scholarly contribution, or an aide to students, or even a guide for would-be actors or directors. It is just an attractive presentation of a one of Shakespeare's most tightly-constructed plays, with a supplement. Since I just reviewed the "Norton Critical Edition" of the play, with its textual notes, glosses to the text, and selected source-texts and critical essays, I found this a welcome change. The first of the two is a 1901 illustrated edition, the work of Robert Anning Bell: about eighty full, half, and quarter-page illustrations and page decorations. with the text of the then-current "Cambridge Edition." This is reproduced with some loss; the text combined with pictures is omitted, and a separate digital text provided; half the front end-paper is missing; facing pages no longer face each other. However, the reproduction of the art is crisp and clean. The cover art has been colored, which definitely adds to the clarity. Since the text of "The Tempest" is in unusually good condition, the lack of annotations or glossary is a relatively minor concern. However, unless you've read the play before, having an annotated or glossed edition handy might be useful. Those curious about the differences between the print and Kindle versions can check using two digitalized copies (in different states of repair, and slightly sepia-toned) on the Library of Congress site (archive.org); search under the illustrator's name, it is a lot easier than sorting through pages of Shakespeare! Bell's illustrations from time to time remind me of Aubrey Beardsley's illustrations to Malory's "Morte D'Arthur" and of the Waite-Ryder Tarot deck. The general description of the style as art nouveau, without reference to specific influences, is reasonable. His version of the half-human (we are told) Caliban looks something like a Skrull (old foes of The Fantastic Four, as Marvel fans may recall), and something like a marooned Vulcan (which I don't think needs an explanation yet). The second part is a set of eight full-page illustrations to the play by the famous illustrator Walter Crane, originally published by Dent in 1894. The Kindle versions of these are supposed to be in high resolution, and they show up crisp and clear on my monitor. What purports to be a separate Kindle edition of these illustrations by Crane was apparently transferred from Project Gutenberg, and, somehow, the art is actually missing -- it just has the selected texts Crane chose to illustrate. (Of course, that version is free, so your only loss will be a little time and frustration.) Crane, best known today for his groundbreaking illustrations for children's books, does a good job with the Shakespearean setting and characters. In his case, I think I see reflections of the Pre-Raphaelites, in particular Burne-Jones -- but an art historian may see it as a matter of period styles. Crane's illustrations also appeared in a 1908 edition by Oliver Smeaton (Henry Holt, New York), and possibly elsewhere. For those not already familiar with the play, it is one of the few Shakespeare works without a recognizable source for the main plot, although there is documentation for many details in the voyage literature of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century. Most of the other parallels which have been suggested are too general to tie to the play, or just too distant. The mysterious magician, his beautiful daughter, the handsome young hero, the magician's attendant spirits -- all the commonplaces of traditional fairytales and romances and of the commedia dell'arte, too. (G. Wilson Knight even found some parallels in the Ming Dynasty novel "Journey to the West," otherwise known as "Monkey," to the relations of Prospero to Ariel and Caliban; see his "The Crown of Life," pages 229-230.) Of course, this works the other way, as well. For some time I've consider "The Tempest" to be a fore-runner, if not an ancestor, of much genre fantasy. It is all there; the elaborate back-story, the conniving courtiers, the magician's seemingly arbitrary actions, the touchingly naive heroine, and the magical apparatus. Leaving aside the constraints of the stage, and the glorious language, the main difference I can see is that in "The Tempest" there is serious question of whether evil should be punished, or if the evil-doers should be forgiven, and vengeance, and the evils it generates, be forsaken.

A barren island lost in the sea, a harsh prison, is the place in which Shakespeare creates a world rich in mythology, nobility and revenge. A revenge that I thought it was going to end in a certain way but ended in another way in a human and natural ending. It is so exciting to read, in its short extension the words convey much information charged with intense emotions, as if it were an old nordic saga. For example Prospero is always asking in a salty way if he is being heard and understood, it is evident he has been terribly wronged in the past, and that it was due to his own innocence of character, he is not going to allow it to happen again. And so with all the characters, the more we get to know of them the more complex they are. The magic is superb, Shakespeare is a genius in which this presence of magic doesn't overpower the story (as it happens with many cinema directors that sacrifice the plot relying instead in CGI) instead it gives it a timeless taste, a classic taste. Think in his contemporary Cervantes for example, the Don Quixote is glorious but, as it is set in a country under the strict social presence of the Catholic Church (I say it in a respectful way, I understand in those years the Church had pressure to avoid a loss of members) he could write about fantasy only in a mocking way and even at the beginning a priest burns most of the fantasy books for being not correct. In "The Tempest" there is not judgement of the fantasy, the world seems so real in the way the supernatural is accepted as religious persons accept the idea of miracles in their lives. I don't like theater, I would not like to see the descriptions of magical deeds of this story through imitations from a theater, nor the vast feelings that the island conveys in me to a small scenery. Shakespeare maybe is my best discovery of the year and I am happy to have him with his own words fueling my imagination to astonishing heights. About the AmazonClassics Edition is perfect, I don't want any other edition that could be spoiled with introductions by intellectuals that tend to think the reader already know the book or, even worse, that we are interested in their opinions about themselves. The AmazonClassics Edition has the text in its purity, with a professional formatting and a modern typography that makes it an example of a proper kindle edition. So if you choose this edition possibly you are choosing the best edition available.

I really enjoyed reading this play; although at times the language can be hard to understand...the further explanations the play has to follow along are great.

Apparently the last play Shakespeare wrote by himself. It’s a nice, clean work, and smooth to read. There’s a tradition seeing this as Shakespeare’s farewell to the stage, and I think that reading fits. Sometimes I think the clowns and fools in the plays are expressing Shakespeare’s own opinions, but that’s not a perfect fit. Prospero is probably the closest we get to a Shakespeare proxy, and this makes Prospero’s plea for rest at the end of the play all the more touching. The Signet specifically is a great edition. Great cover art, an attractive jacket, compact size, readable font, and helpful footnotes. These editions are my favorite way to read Shakespeare.

Livro em formato digital enviado diretamente para o Kindle. Muito rápido e formato ótimo.

Muy didactico

Gerne wieder

Pas de problème, livre reçu (pas très rapidement, certes) mais en très bonne état ! Livre de bonne qualité, semble solide, édition intéressante. Je le conseille !

جودته جيدة إلى حد ما